DF Weekly: Alan Wake 2 Delivers a Day of Reckoning For Older Pc GPU Owners > Open

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

But perfectly viable upgrades needn't cost the earth.

-----

We'd been anticipating a recreation to arrive that will virtually demand that you just upgrade your Pc hardware, and it isn't completely stunning that it could be Remedy's Alan Wake 2. However, what we didn't anticipate was it could be help for DX12 mesh shader hardware that can be the dividing line between a good expertise and a bad one. Practically, what this means is that there's dangerous information right here for owners of vintage 2016/2017 Nvidia GTX 10-sequence Pascal hardware as Alan Wake 2 performance is fairly dire, even on the majestic GTX 1080 Ti. The lack of mesh shader help additionally signifies that AMD's vintage 2019 RDNA 1 playing cards additionally suffer, though not fairly to the identical diploma.

You may learn all about what mesh shaders actually are elsewhere, however the underside line is that it more simply allows for the efficient processing of detail-wealthy scenes - and Alan Wake 2 is awash with incredibly excessive detail assets. On Pc, fallbacks exist to allow the sport to run on older GPUs, but you may have to accept some alarming drops in efficiency. Even on GTX 1080 Ti, I famous that the game may drop into the teens running at 1080p, upscaled from 720p using FSR 2 high quality mode. In those self same scenes, the RTX 2080 - typically cited as having comparable rasterisation performance to the 1080 Ti - runs 6.3x quicker.

Those outcomes are something of an outlier, but even in additional customary AW2 gaming, there's still a stark divide between three GPUs that generally have comparable rasterisation capabilities. In the forest initially of the game, the RTX 2080 beats 1080 Ti with an additional 177 p.c of efficiency, while the RX 5700 XT is 63 % faster than the Pascal legend.

0:00:00 Introduction0:00:Forty five News 01: Alan Wake 2: a tech masterpiece0:34:12 News 02: New PS5 needs web to pair disc drive0:42:18 News 03: MGS Master Collection Volume 1 released0:58:16 News 04: MGS Delta Snake Eater demoed1:07:37 News 05: Star Citizen enhancements, new content shown off at CitizenCon1:21:Forty eight Supporter Q1: Given that Alan Wake 2 doesn’t support Pascal GPUs, pascal slot is it time for a GTX 1080/Ti eulogy?1:28:51 Supporter Q2: Any thoughts on Intel's 14th gen CPUs?1:31:24 Supporter Q3: How may Horizon Zero Dawn and TLOU 2 be meaningfully remastered for PS5?1:40:Fifty three Supporter Q4: Are higher visible features really well worth the picture quality hit on consoles?1:49:10 Supporter Q5: What are John's impressions of the Meta Quest 3?
A day of reckoning was at all times coming for 10-collection cards and up till the discharge of Alan Wake 2, the sensible cash would have been on obligatory support for hardware accelerated ray tracing representing the primary motive to upgrade. The idea that it can be mesh shaders that would characterize the dividing line does come as a bit of a shock, but the underside line is that the current generation consoles' assist for RT is a bit of lacklustre, while mesh shading support clearly works, as Alan Wake 2 seems stunning on at the moment's consoles. Even PlayStation 5, which options a less strong geometry engine, seems to deliver good results and sturdy efficiency.

The final panic surrounding Alan Wake's Pc efficiency was amplified somewhat by really helpful specs from Remedy itself, which - I feel it's fair to say - are somewhat conservative. Remedy lists the AMD Radeon RX 6600 as a base-spec GPU for Alan Wake 2, citing 1080p at low settings at 30fps in terms of expectation ranges for that class of hardware. We have to be looking at absolute worst case situations there, because even on the equivalent of PS5's high quality mode (essentially the medium preset, with low high quality post-processing), the sport runs much faster than that.

It also seems that the mesh shader requirement for good performance means that GPUs which are far much less capable than the RX 6600 work surprisingly properly. Take Nvidia's GTX 16-class GPUs, for instance. You may consider them as RTX 20-series offerings with the RT and tensor cores stripped out and while performance of, say, the GTX 1660 Ti is weaker than an RTX 2060 typically, I might still play Alan Wake at PS5 quality mode settings at 1080p resolution using FSR 2 quality mode and efficiency remained above 30fps. It's because some DX12 features similar to variable price shading and - yes - mesh shaders are still supported on these lower-again Turing GPUs.

There are nonetheless an unlimited amount of 10-sequence GTX cards in use although, and the concept of effectively being compelled to improve your Pc could be troublesome as a result of pricing in the graphics market hasn't been nice in recent times. However, there are plenty of strong choices that needn't break the bank. The RX 6600 might have limited RT performance, nevertheless it does help the total DX12 Ultimate function set and it is sometimes obtainable around the $180/£180 mark. Meanwhile, I noted over the weekend that the extra helpful RX 6650 XT now sits simply north of $200/£200 on sale. There's additionally much to commend the RTX 3060 12GB and the RTX 4060 8GB. One has more memory, the opposite has better efficiency and body era - each are now obtainable well beneath $299/£299. If you happen to spent £500-£600 on the GTX 1080 Ti back within the day, a similar amount of cash will get you an RX 7800 XT or RTX 4070, each of which signify stable upgrades.

Briefly, Alan Wake 2 could also be demanding an upgrade for these on older GPUs, but the sport is scalable sufficient to make sure you do not need to be spending 1000's on an RTX 4090 to be able to get pleasure from a wonderful experience from the game. And the truth is, while Alan Wake 2 has very particular requirements with game-changing efficiency benefits, the transfer away from cross-gen releases towards titles specifically concentrating on PS5-class hardware has necessitated the necessity for extra horsepower outside of the graphics arena.

An SSD is actually mandatory now for the newest games, but perhaps extra impactful is the necessity for more highly effective CPU. There was a time when Zen 2 class Ryzens like the traditional Ryzen 5 3600 often proved greater than sufficient to hit a 60fps baseline - however an increasing number of video games are requiring one thing a lot meatier. Right now, I'd be recommending a Ryzen 5 5600 or Intel Core i5 12400F as the minimal for a mainstream construct - and this in itself may require the acquisition of a brand new motherboard and perhaps some memory too. No less than Ryzen 5000 is appropriate with a spread of older boards and in the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, it's attainable to increase the life of a 2018-class gaming Pc to a surprising extent.

Alan Wake 2 could symbolize a watershed of kinds for Pc gaming, while mesh shader help practically calls for a GPU upgrade for these with older video cards. However, console users have had to upgrade from Xbox One/PS4 to Xbox Series/PS5 and there always comes a time when a brand new game - or a new wave of video games - demands some type of Pc upgrade. But to put it plainly: trust me, Alan Wake 2 is worth it.